Development and validation of a French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The Pedi-IKDC is an English-language, knee-specific, paediatric questionnaire used by orthopaedic surgeons around the world as a valuable patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The objective of this study was thus to extend the applicability of the Pedi-IKDC to French-speaking Canadian patients, for both clinical practice and research, by developing a French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the original version. HYPOTHESIS: The French adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC is valid and reliable for evaluating French-speaking children with knee conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Pedi-IKDC was translated to French by a panel of orthopaedic surgeons then back-translated by a professional translator. The original English version and the back-translation were compared to assess their similarity and confirm the faithfulness of the French translation. The validity of the French version was then tested at a major paediatric hospital in French-speaking Canada, in 203 children, including 163 with knee pain and 40 without knee symptoms. Internal consistency, construct validity, and discriminant capacity of the French version were assessed. RESULTS: Internal consistency of the Pedi-IKDC adaptation was excellent (Cronbach's alpha, 0.934 in the knee-pain group). Construct validity was robust, with all nine hypotheses adapted from the original Pedi-IKDC article demonstrating strong (n=7) or moderate (n=2) correlations (p<0.001). The evaluation of discriminant capacity identified no statistically significant score differences according to most of the respondent characteristics (body mass index, age group, type of diagnosis, and type of treatment). However, scores differed significantly between females and males. DISCUSSION: The French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC obtained using a universally recognized method for translating PROMs demonstrated good performance, with psychometric properties similar to those of the original Pedi-IKDC and of its Danish, Italian, and Russian adaptations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Are outdoor playgrounds the real culprit for elbow fractures in children? A lesson learned from COVID-19 sanitary measures.

BACKGROUND: The association between elbow fractures and outdoor playgrounds has always been anecdotal. We sought to determine the impact of closing outdoor playgrounds and other play areas during the COVID-19 lockdown on elbow fractures in a pediatric population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all elbow fractures from a single pediatric referral hospital between 2016 and 2020 for the months of April and May. The months chosen corresponded to the COVID-19 lockdown during which outdoor playgrounds were closed. Inclusion criteria were elbow fracture diagnosis based on radiography and age younger than 18 years. Fracture type, where the injury occurred and the mechanism of injury were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 370 fractures were reported, with an average of 83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 83-84) per year for 2016-19 and only 36 recorded in 2020. The average annual number of fractures before 2020 was 17 (95% CI 16-17) for schools, and 33 (95% CI 31-34) for outdoor playgrounds, including 22 (95% CI 21-24) falls from playground structures. No fracture was reported in schools in 2020, and only 3 were reported from outdoor playgrounds (including 1 associated with falling from playground structures). CONCLUSION: We found an association between elbow fractures in a pediatric population and outdoor playground accessibility, but also with indoor public locations. Our findings emphasize the importance of safety measures in those facilities.

Outcome of retroarticular drilling for osteochondritis dissecans of the talus in a pediatric population.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of bone marrow stimulation for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the talus in pediatric patients is not optimal. The objective was to evaluate the retroarticular drilling technique for talar OCD. METHODS: A retrospective case-series study of pediatric cases treated for talar OCD with retroarticular drilling was done. Clinical and radiological outcome scores were recorded as follows: the percentage of patients who had a successful treatment, the percentage for every category of the Berndt and Harty treatment result grading and the percentage for every radiographical outcome score were computed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (18 girls; mean age: 14.6 ± 2.1 years) were included. The mean follow-up was 14.8 (±11.7) months. 26.3% required revision surgery. The Berndt and Harty scores were: 57.9% good, 10.5% fair, 31.6% poor. Radiological outcomes were: 21% healed, 47.4% partially healed, 31.6% no healing. The radiological outcome score was better for younger patients (P = 0.01) and those with an open physis (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: 26.3% of patients needed revision surgery after talar OCD retroarticular drilling and 21% were healed radiographically. Skeletal immaturity and a younger age were associated to a better radiological outcome.